Do Bone Scans Overstage Disease Compared with PSMA PET at Initial Staging? An International Multicenter Retrospective Study with Masked Independent Readers

• Published in: Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 64; no. 11; pp. 1744 - 1747
• Main Authors: Hope, Thomas A, Benz, Matthias, Jiang, Fei, Thompson, Daniel, Barbato, Francesco, Juarez, Roxana, Hernandez Pampaloni, Miguel, Allen-Auerbach, Martin, Gupta, Pawan, Fendler, Wolfgang P, Calais, Jeremie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Society of Nuclear Medicine 01-11-2023
• Subjects: Antigens; Bone diseases; Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Bone Neoplasms - secondary; Castration; Clinical trials; Computed tomography; Gallium Radioisotopes; Humans; Male; Metastases; Positron emission; Positron emission tomography; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods; Prostate cancer; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology; Radiation therapy; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Scintigraphy; radiopharmaceuticals; prostate cancer; PSMA PET; bone scans; initial staging; oncology
• ISSN: 0161-5505; 1535-5667; 1535-5667; 2159-662X
• DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265916

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has a higher accuracy than CT and bone scans to stage patients with prostate cancer. We do not understand how to apply clinical trial data based on conventional imaging to patients staged using PSMA PET. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ability of bone scans to detect osseous metastases using PSMA PET as a reference standard.
In this multicenter retrospective diagnostic study, 167 patients with prostate cancer, who were imaged with bone scans and PSMA PET performed within 100 d, were included for analysis. Each study was interpreted by 3 masked readers, and the results of the PSMA PET were used as the reference standard. Endpoints were positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and specificity for bone scans. Additionally, interreader reproducibility, positivity rate, uptake on PSMA PET, and the number of lesions were evaluated.
In total, 167 patients were included, with 77 at initial staging, 60 in the biochemical recurrence and castration-sensitive prostate cancer setting, and 30 in the castration-resistant prostate cancer setting. In all patients, the PPV, NPV, and specificity for bone scans were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.82), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), respectively. In patients at initial staging, the PPV, NPV, and specificity for bone scans were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.26-0.63), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.85-0.98), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.88), respectively. Interreader agreement for bone disease was moderate for bone scans (Fleiss κ, 0.51) and substantial for the PSMA PET reference standard (Fleiss κ, 0.80).
In this multicenter retrospective study, the PPV of bone scans was low in patients at initial staging, with 57% of positive bone scans being false positives. This suggests that a large proportion of patients considered low-volume metastatic by the bone scan actually had localized disease, which is critical when applying clinical data from trials such as the STAMPEDE M1 radiation therapy trial to patients being staged with PSMA PET.