Ineffective Airway Clearance in Surgical Patients: Evaluation of Nursing Interventions and Outcomes
PURPOSE To evaluate the benefits of NIC interventions in postoperative patients with ineffective airway clearance (00031). METHODS Quasi‐experimental study with interrupted time‐series design. A total of 101 patients were evaluated during 4 days based on the nursing outcome Respiratory Status: Airwa...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of nursing knowledge Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 251 - 256 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
01-10-2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | PURPOSE
To evaluate the benefits of NIC interventions in postoperative patients with ineffective airway clearance (00031).
METHODS
Quasi‐experimental study with interrupted time‐series design. A total of 101 patients were evaluated during 4 days based on the nursing outcome Respiratory Status: Airway Patency (0410).
FINDINGS
Interventions such as cough enhancement (3250), ventilation assistance (3390), and airway management (3140) contributed to significative improvements of the patients’ airway patency. Site of surgery and patients’ intrinsic characteristics were proven to have influence in the NOC ratings.
CONCLUSIONS
Interventions implemented during the research contributed to improvement of clinical indicators of airway patency.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE
Postoperative respiratory complications can be minimized by the use of standardized nursing languages. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Authors’ contributions LFMS, LMP, SFLN, PVCG, VECSF, AGAA, and MSN contributed to the conception and design of this study. LMP, SFLN, LFMS, and AGAA contributed to the acquisition of data. LMP, LFMS, SFLN, VECSF, and MSN performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. LFMS, LMP, SFLN, PVCG, VECSF, AGAA, and MSN reviewed the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Conflict of interest ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2047-3087 2047-3095 |
DOI: | 10.1111/2047-3095.12242 |