The evolution of sociality and the polyvagal theory
The polyvagal theory (PT), offered by Porges (2021), proposes that the autonomic nervous system (ANS) was repurposed in mammals, via a “second vagal nerve”, to suppress defensive strategies and support the expression of sociality. Three critical assumptions of this theory are that (1) the transition...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biological psychology Vol. 180; p. 108569 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01-05-2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The polyvagal theory (PT), offered by Porges (2021), proposes that the autonomic nervous system (ANS) was repurposed in mammals, via a “second vagal nerve”, to suppress defensive strategies and support the expression of sociality. Three critical assumptions of this theory are that (1) the transition of the ANS was associated with the evolution of ‘social’ mammals from ‘asocial’ reptiles; (2) the transition enabled mammals, unlike their reptilian ancestors, to derive a biological benefit from social interactions; and (3) the transition forces a less parsimonious explanation (convergence) for the evolution of social behavior in birds and mammals, since birds evolved from a reptilian lineage. Two recently published reviews, however, provided compelling evidence that the social-asocial dichotomy is overly simplistic, neglects the diversity of vertebrate social systems, impedes our understanding of the evolution of social behavior, and perpetuates the erroneous belief that one group—non-avian reptiles—is incapable of complex social behavior. In the worst case, if PT depends upon a transition from ‘asocial reptiles’ to ‘social mammals’, then the ability of PT to explain the evolution of the mammalian ANS is highly questionable. A great number of social behaviors occur in both reptiles and mammals. In the best case, PT has misused the terms ‘social’ and ‘asocial’. Even here, however, the theory would still need to identify a particular suite of behaviors found in mammals and not reptiles that could be associated with, or explain, the transition of the ANS, and then replace the ‘asocial’ and ‘social’ labels with more specific descriptors.
•Polyvagal theory suggests sociality evolved with changes in autonomic nervous system.•The theory assumes reptiles are non-social and derive no benefits from sociality.•Our previous reviews demonstrated complex sociality and benefits in reptiles.•Ability of polyvagal theory to explain the mammalian ANS is highly questionable. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0301-0511 1873-6246 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108569 |