Bias Correction for Precipitation Simulated by RegCM4 over the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Based on the Mixed Distribution Quantile Mapping Method

• Published in: Atmosphere Vol. 12; no. 12; p. 1566
• Main Authors: Li, Bingxue, Huang, Ya, Du, Lijuan, Wang, Dequan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01-12-2021
• Subjects: Annual precipitation; Annual variations; Bias; Climate change; Climate models; Climatology; Coefficients; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Datasets; Distribution; Error correction; extreme precipitation; Extreme value distribution; Extreme values; Extreme weather; Geographical distribution; Geographical locations; Hydrology; Mapping; Methods; mixed distribution; Parameters; Precipitation; Probability distribution functions; quantile mapping method; RegCM4; River basins; Rivers; Root-mean-square errors; Simulation; Variables; Wind; China; Yangtze River
• ISSN: 2073-4433; 2073-4433
• DOI: 10.3390/atmos12121566

Traditional multi-parameter single distribution quantile mapping (QM) methods excel in some respects in correcting climate model precipitation, but are limited in others. Multi-parameter mixed distribution quantile mapping can potentially exploit the strengths of single distribution methods and avoid their weaknesses. The correction performance of mixed distribution QM methods varies with the geographical location they are applied to and the combination of distributions that are included. This study compares multiple sets of single distribution and multi-parameter mixed distribution QM methods in order to correct the precipitation bias in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River basin (UYRB) in RegCM4 simulated precipitation. The results show that, among the selected distributions, the gamma distribution has the highest performance in the basin; explaining more than 50% of the precipitation events based on the weighting coefficients. The Gumbel distribution had the worst performance, only explaining about 10% of the precipitation events. The performance parameters, such as the root mean square error (RMSE) and the correlation coefficient (R) of the corrected precipitation, that were derived by using mixed distribution were better than those derived by using single distribution. The QM method that is based on the gamma-generalized extreme value distribution best corrected the precipitation, could reproduce the annual cycle and geographical pattern of observed precipitation, and could significantly reduce the wet bias from the RegCM4 model in the UYRB. In addition to enhancing precipitation climatology, the correction method also improved the simulation performance of the RegCM4 model for extreme precipitation events.