A glimpse of the complexity of factors that influence financial literacy

• Published in: International journal of consumer studies Vol. 40; no. 6; pp. 722 - 731
• Main Authors: Riitsalu, Leonore, Põder, Kaire
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-11-2016
• Subjects: Behavioural economics; Comparative studies; Cultural differences; Decomposition; Economic factors; Economic indicators; Estonia; financial education; Financial literacy; Gender; Gender differences; Language; Literacy; Mathematics; Personal finance; PISA; Problem solving; Social background; Social status; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomic indicators; Studies; Estonia
• ISSN: 1470-6423; 1470-6431
• DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12291

Financial literacy has been recognised as a vital life skill, but there is little evidence of the factors behind the differences in managing personal finance. Socio‐economic factors and the provision of financial education do explain the variance in financial literacy in some countries, but not in all. In the PISA 2012 financial literacy test, Estonian students ranked very highly in international comparison; although only a few had received financial education at school. Compared with other countries, socio‐economic factors explained the smallest proportion of variance in the test score. There was, however, a significant difference between the mean financial literacy scores of Estonian‐ and Russian‐language communities. The aim of the article is to analyse the factors behind the differences in financial literacy when financial education is not provided. It also offers insight into how students in a similar education system in two different cultural and language frameworks achieve different financial literacy scores. Moreover, the results demonstrate how indicators, such as family background can work through different channels as opposed to the usual parental education or occupation based socio‐economic indicators. The latter implies that unexplained factors remain, such as cultural, developmental and societal indicators, which most researchers pay little attention to when explaining efficient policies for improving financial literacy. Multivariate regression models show that the level of financial literacy in Estonia is correlated with gender, language of the school, the number of books at home, mathematics and reading scores. The Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition explains less than half of the gap between the two communities. The only variable significantly explaining the gap is the number of books at home. Books can be interpreted as a symbol of social status, evidence of cultural background or source of influence for broader picture and better problem solving skills.