A molecular epidemiologic survey of HIV in Uganda

Objective: Previous data, based on a small sampling of convenience, reported subtypes A, B, C, D, and G in Uganda, but neither the extent nor the proportion of these subtypes could be evaluated. To establish correctly the prevalence and distribution of HIV-1 subtypes, we analysed viral clades in 739...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:AIDS (London) Vol. 12; no. 5; pp. 521 - 527
Main Authors: RAYFIELD, M. A, DOWNING, R. G, BAGGS, J, HU, D. J, PIENIAZEK, D, LUO, C.-C, BIRYAHWAHO, B, OTTEN, R. A, SEMPALA, S. D. K, DONDERO, T. J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 26-03-1998
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: Previous data, based on a small sampling of convenience, reported subtypes A, B, C, D, and G in Uganda, but neither the extent nor the proportion of these subtypes could be evaluated. To establish correctly the prevalence and distribution of HIV-1 subtypes, we analysed viral clades in 739 HIV-1-seropositive specimens from different areas of Uganda. Methods: Blood specimens from 1100 patients were collected in five districts of Uganda. Within this collection, 929 HIV-1-seroreactive samples underwent analysis of viral DNA, and 739 were selected for further subtyping in env or pol regions. Results: Using a combination of subtype A- and D-specific probes to C2-V3 region and DNA sequencing, HIV-1 env subtypes were determined in 594 specimens: 341 were of subtype A (57.4%), 250 of subtype D (42.1%), and three of subtype C (0.5%). Sixty-two samples showed reactivity with both probes, suggesting potential mixed infections, cross-reactivity to probes, or possibly other subtypes. Subsequent sequence analysis of 19 randomly selected specimens revealed subtypes A (n = 4), D (n = 12), and C (n = 3). Sequence analysis of the 27 samples chosen from the remaining 83 samples, which could be amplified only with viral gp41 or protease gene primers, classified them as subtypes A (n = 13) and D (n = 14). No significant clinical, demographic, or geographic differences were found between HIV-1 infections with viruses of subtypes A and D, despite considerable genetic diversity within these clades. Conclusions: This is the first major population-based study of the prevalent HIV-1 strains in an African country selected for vaccine trials. The subtyping methods we describe should be of use to investigators seeking to conduct large-scale screening for HIV variants in other populations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0269-9370
1473-5571
DOI:10.1097/00002030-199805000-00014