Short-term assessment of pain and discomfort during rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne appliances: randomized clinical trial

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate and compare, during the first week of rapid maxillary expansion (RME), the impact caused by two types of appliances: Hyrax and Hybrid Hyrax. Methods: Forty-two patients who met the eligibility criteria (aged 11-14 years, w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dental press journal of orthodontics Vol. 28; no. 4; p. e2322220
Main Authors: PASQUA, Bruno de Paula Machado, ANDRÉ, Cristiane Barros, PAIVA, João Batista de, RINO NETO, José
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2023
Dental Press Editora
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate and compare, during the first week of rapid maxillary expansion (RME), the impact caused by two types of appliances: Hyrax and Hybrid Hyrax. Methods: Forty-two patients who met the eligibility criteria (aged 11-14 years, with transverse maxillary deficiency, posterior crossbite, and presence of maxillary first premolars and first permanent molars) were selected and randomly divided into two groups: TBB GROUP (tooth-bone-borne expander), treated with Hybrid Hyrax (12 females and 9 males, mean age 13.3 ± 1.3 years), and TB GROUP (tooth-borne expander), treated with Hyrax (5 females and 16 males, mean age 13.3 ± 1.4 years). Pain and discomfort were assessed in two times: after the first day of activation (T1) and four days after, by means of the numerical rate scale and the instrument MFIQ (Mandibular Functional Impairment Questionnaire). Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney test were used for comparison between groups and between sexes. A 5% significance level was adopted. Results: Both appliances had a negative impact, generating pain and discomfort, and reducing functional capacity. However, the scores obtained were of low intensity and no significant differences were observed between the groups. Considering sexes, there were statistically significant differences, with the female sex presenting higher scores for pain and functional limitation. Conclusions: Despite causing impact in pain and increase in the functional limitation, these changes were of low intensity, with no statistical difference between the groups. Females were more sensitive to the impact caused by the RME. RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo deste ensaio clínico randomizado foi avaliar e comparar, durante a primeira semana de expansão rápida da maxila (ERM), o impacto causado por dois tipos de aparelhos: Hyrax e Hyrax Híbrido. Métodos: Quarenta e dois pacientes que atendiam aos critérios de seleção (idade de 11 a 14 anos, com deficiência transversal da maxila, mordida cruzada posterior e presença de primeiros pré-molares e primeiros molares permanentes superiores) foram selecionados e divididos aleatoriamente em dois grupos: Grupo DOS (expansor dento-osseossuportado), tratado com Hyrax Híbrido (12 mulheres e 9 homens, idade média 13,3 ± 1,3 anos), e Grupo DS (expansor dentossuportado), tratado com Hyrax (5 mulheres e 16 homens, idade média de 13,3 ± 1,4 anos). A dor e o desconforto foram avaliados em dois momentos: após o primeiro dia de ativação (T1) e após quatro dias, por meio da escala de frequência numérica e do instrumento MFIQ (Questionário de Limitação Funcional Mandibular). A estatística descritiva e o teste de Mann-Whitney foram utilizados para comparação entre os grupos e entre os sexos. Adotou-se nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Ambos os aparelhos tiveram impacto negativo, gerando dor e desconforto e reduzindo a capacidade funcional. No entanto, os escores obtidos foram de baixa intensidade e não foram observadas diferenças significativas entre os grupos. Considerando os sexos, houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas, com o sexo feminino apresentando maiores escores para dor e limitação funcional. Conclusões: Apesar de causar impacto na dor e aumento na limitação funcional, essas alterações foram de baixa intensidade, sem diferença estatística entre os grupos. As mulheres foram mais sensíveis ao impacto causado pela ERM.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
The authors report no commercial, proprietary or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.
ISSN:2176-9451
2177-6709
2177-6709
DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.28.4.e2322220.oar