Exploring patient perspectives on telemedicine monitoring within the operating room

• Published in: International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Vol. 156; p. 104595
• Main Authors: Abraham, Joanna, Meng, Alicia, Holzer, Katherine J., Brawer, Luke, Casarella, Aparna, Avidan, Michael, Politi, Mary C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01-12-2021
• Subjects: Adult; Communication; Female; Hospitals; Humans; Male; Monitoring, Physiologic; Operating room; Operating Rooms; Remote monitoring; Surgery; Telemedicine; United States; United States; Telemedicine; Surgery; Operating room; Remote monitoring
• ISSN: 1386-5056; 1872-8243
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104595

•Patients believe intraoperative telemedicine (eOR) enhances patient safety.•eOR acceptability and adoption rely on 4 out of 8 categorized patient perceptions.•Patients feel more comfortable with local monitoring over international monitoring.
Clinical decision support systems and telemedicine for remote monitoring can together support clinicians' intraoperative decision-making and management of surgical patients' care. However, there has been limited investigation on patient perspectives about advanced health information technology use in intraoperative settings, especially an electronic OR (eOR) for remote monitoring and management of surgical patients.
Our study objectives were: (1) to identify participant-rated items contributing to patient attitudes, beliefs, and level of comfort with eOR monitoring; and (2) to highlight barriers and facilitators to eOR use.
We surveyed 324 individuals representing surgical patients across the United States using Amazon Mechanical Turk, an online platform supporting internet-based work. The structured survey questions examined the level of agreement and comfort with eOR for remote patient monitoring. We calculated descriptive statistics for demographic variables and performed a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test to assess whether participants were more comfortable with familiar clinicians from local hospitals or health systems monitoring their health and safety status during surgery than clinicians from hospitals or health systems in other regions or countries. We also analyzed open-ended survey responses using a thematic approach informed by an eight-dimensional socio-technical model.
Participants’ average age was 34.07 (SD = 10.11). Most were white (80.9%), male (57.1%), and had a high school degree or more (88.3%). Participants reported a higher level of comfort with clinicians they knew monitoring their health and safety than clinicians they did not know, even within the same healthcare system (z = -4.012, p < .001). They reported significantly higher comfort levels with clinicians within the same hospital or health system in the United States than those in a different country (z = -10.230, p < .001). Facilitators and barriers to eOR remote monitoring were prevalent across four socio-technical dimensions: 1) organizational policies, procedures, environment, and culture; 2) people; 3) workflow and communication; and 4) hardware and software. Facilitators to eOR use included perceptions of improved patient safety through a safeguard system and perceptions of streamlined care. Barriers included fears of incorrect eOR patient assessments, decision-making conflicts between care teams, and technological malfunctions.
Participants expressed significant support for intraoperative telemedicine use and greater comfort with local telemedicine systems instead of long-distance telemedicine systems. Reservations centered on organizational policies, procedures, environment, culture; people; workflow and communication; and hardware and software. To improve the buy-in and acceptability of remote monitoring by an eOR team, we offer a few evidence-based guidelines applicable to telemedicine use within the context of OR workflow. Guidelines include backup plans for technical challenges, rigid care, and privacy standards, and patient education to increase understanding of telemedicine’s potential to improve patient care.