Underestimation of sulfate concentration in PM2.5 using a semi-continuous particle instrument based on ion chromatography
Recently, a variety of ion-chromatography-based semi-continuous particle instruments such as the Dionex gas particle ion chromatograph (GP-IC), wet-annular denuder/steam-jet aerosol collector (WAD/SJAC), particle-into-liquid sampler with ion chromatograph (PILS-IC), gas and aerosol monitoring system...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental monitoring Vol. 11; no. 6; p. 1292 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
01-01-2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get more information |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Recently, a variety of ion-chromatography-based semi-continuous particle instruments such as the Dionex gas particle ion chromatograph (GP-IC), wet-annular denuder/steam-jet aerosol collector (WAD/SJAC), particle-into-liquid sampler with ion chromatograph (PILS-IC), gas and aerosol monitoring system (GAMS) have been introduced for measuring particle chemical components in the atmosphere. It has been reported that sulfate concentrations in PM2.5 measured by these semi-continuous particle instruments correlate well with those measured by other semi-continuous instruments such as the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS), R&P 8400S and R&P 8400N analyzers, and Thermo model 5020 sulfate particle analyzer and at times exhibit a unity slope. However, the sulfate concentration measured by some of these semi-continuous instruments has been reported to be underestimated by 20-50%, as compared to that in PM2.5 filter samples. In this study, numerous potential causes for underestimation of the sulfate concentrations by the GP-IC were investigated. We found a 30-40% negative artifact arising from an improper calibration procedure inherent within the instrument design. An improved calibration procedure was developed and it substantially reduced the sulfate concentration difference between the GP-IC measurements and PM2.5 filter samples from 36% to 5%. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1464-0333 |
DOI: | 10.1039/b819630c |