Dosing of Enoxaparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Obese Patients

Objective: To evaluate the appropriate dosing of enoxaparin as a venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized obese patients. Data Sources: Literature articles were accessed through MEDLINE (1946 to August week 1, 2013) and EMBASE (1980 to 2013 week 33) searches using the terms enoxapari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of Pharmacotherapy Vol. 47; no. 12; pp. 1717 - 1720
Main Authors: Willett, Kristine C., Alsharhan, Mohammad, Durand, Cheryl, Cooper, Maryann R.
Format: Book Review Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-12-2013
Whitney
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To evaluate the appropriate dosing of enoxaparin as a venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized obese patients. Data Sources: Literature articles were accessed through MEDLINE (1946 to August week 1, 2013) and EMBASE (1980 to 2013 week 33) searches using the terms enoxaparin, obesity, and thromboprophylaxis. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All articles that involved human subjects and were published in the English language, evaluating the appropriate dose of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized, obese patients were included. Data Synthesis: Appropriate enoxaparin dosing for thromboprophylaxis in adult patients is 40 mg subcutaneously daily or 30 mg subcutaneously twice daily. Although obesity is considered one of the risk factors for thromboembolism, morbidly obese patients were excluded from most clinical trials; therefore, the appropriate enoxaparin preventive dose is not clear in this population. In recent years, the appropriate dose of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in obese patients has been evaluated in 3 clinical studies. All studies enrolled patients with various risk factors for thromboembolism and evaluated different enoxaparin dosing regimens. End point analyses were all based on anti-Xa levels. Conclusions: Due to a lack of well-designed prospective, randomized control studies, varying doses of enoxaparin are used for VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized, obese patients. All doses studied were monitored using anti-Xa levels. Patient follow-up was of short duration in all studies and did not show long-term effectiveness of enoxaparin. Prospective, randomized controlled studies are warranted to show efficacy and safety of one dosage regimen over another.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1060-0280
1542-6270
DOI:10.1177/1060028013507902