Distribution and prevalence of refractive error in Iranian adult population results of the PERSIAN eye cohort study PECS

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 14515 - 14
• Main Authors: Alipour, Fateme, Mohammadzadeh, Maryam, Jafari, Fatemeh, Lashay, Alireza, Yaseri, Mehdi, Motamed-Gorji, Nazgol, Alizadeh, Yousef, Soleimani, Mohammadreza, Mirzaei, Mohammad, Shahraki, Kourosh, Salimpour, Samira, Shoja, Mohammad Reza, Khataminia, Gholamreza, Tahkor, Abolfazl, Tavakoli, Roya, Somi, Mohammad hossein, Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz, Joukar, Farahnaz, Ansari-Moghaddam, Alireza, Saki, Nader, Hashemi, Hassan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 24-06-2024; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 692/308; 692/699; 692/700; Acuity; Adult; Aged; Aging; Astigmatism; Cataracts; Cohort analysis; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Data collection; Education; Eye; Female; Gender; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Hyperopia - epidemiology; Income; Iran - epidemiology; Male; Middle Aged; multidisciplinary; Myopia; Myopia - epidemiology; Older people; Population studies; Prevalence; Refraction; Refractive Errors - epidemiology; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Iran
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65328-2

The Persian Eye Cohort Study, a population-based cross-sectional study from 2015 to 2020, examined refractive error prevalence among 48,618 Iranian adults aged 31 to 70. The study encompassed six centers in Iran, employing random cluster sampling for demographic, medical, and socioeconomic data collection through interviews. Ophthalmic exams included visual acuity, automated and manual objective refraction, subjective refraction, slit lamp, and fundus examinations. Using the spherical equivalent definition, the sample population was categorized into groups. Results indicated a mean age of 49.52 ± 9.31 and a mean refractive error of 0.26 diopters (D) ± 1.6 SD (95% CI − 0.27 to -0.24), ranging from -26.1 to + 18.5 SD. Prevalence of myopia (< −0.5D) and hyperopia (> + 0.5D) was 22.6% (95% CI 22.2–23%) and 12.5% (95% CI 12.1–12.8%), respectively. Regarding different age groups, the prevalence of hyperopia and astigmatism exhibited a steady and significant rise with increasing age (
p
-value < 0.001 for both). The prevalence of Myopia, however, showed a distinctive pattern, initially increasing in adults under 45, declining in those aged 55–64, and rising again among individuals aged 60 and older. Female gender, older age, urban residency, higher education, higher income, and Fars ethnicity were significantly related to a higher prevalence of myopia (
p
-value < 0.001 for all). Female gender (
p
-value < 0.001), aging (
p
-value < 0.001), urban residency (
p
-value = 0.029), and lower-income (
p
-value = 0.005) were significantly related to higher prevalence of hyperopia. Astigmatism (> 1D) was prevalent in 25.5% of participants (95% CI 25.1–25.9%) and correlated with male gender, aging, urban residency, illiteracy, and higher income (
p
-value < 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.014, respectively). The study’s comparison with regional and international surveys highlighted the increase in myopia among those over 65 due to higher nuclear cataract rates in older adults. Myopia positively related to education, income, and urban residency, while hyperopia did not exhibit such associations.