Office-based, Minimal-Incision Modified Fenestration Technique for Symptomatic Hydroceles Under Local Anesthesia

• Published in: Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) Vol. 135; pp. 159 - 164
• Main Authors: Ziegelmann, Matthew, Dodge, Nicole, Alom, Manaf, Wymer, Kevin, Kohler, Tobias, Trost, Landon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-01-2020
• Subjects: Aged; Anesthesia, Local; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Scrotum - surgery; Suture Techniques; Testicular Hydrocele - surgery; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - adverse effects; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods
• ISSN: 0090-4295; 1527-9995
• DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.055

To describe a minimal-incision modified fenestration technique (MIMFeT) for symptomatic hydroceles utilizing local anesthesia.
A database was maintained for men undergoing in-office MIMFeT for symptomatic hydroceles between June 2015 and August 2018. Following local anesthesia, the hydrocele was sequentially everted through a small upper hemiscrotal incision, excised, and oversewn without delivering the testicle through the wound. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were subsequently reviewed.
A total of 54 men (median age 67) underwent MIMFeT under local anesthesia for symptomatic hydrocele. Median estimated hydrocele size was 250 mL (IQR 150;500). Medical comorbidities included coronary artery disease (12%), hypertension (43%), diabetes (13%), and current antiplatelet or anticoagulant (44%) use. Six patients (11%) were deemed unsafe for monitored or general anesthesia. About 48 patients had follow-up data available (median 9 months; IQR 2-18). Mild recurrent scrotal swelling occurred in 4 patients (8%) and 9/48 (18%) experienced postoperative complications including hematoma (n = 2), prolonged pain (n = 3), wound infection (n = 2), and partial incisional separation (n = 2). No patient required repeat hydrocelectomy.
Our early results suggest that the MIMFeT for management of symptomatic hydroceles can be safely performed in the office setting under local anesthesia, including in those patients who are determined to be unsafe for monitored and general anesthesia