Key principles of ecosystem‐based management: the fishermen's perspective

• Published in: Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 244 - 253
• Main Authors: Long, Rachel D, Charles, Anthony, Stephenson, Robert L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-03-2017
• Subjects: EBM principles; ecosystem approach to fisheries; Ecosystems; ecosystem‐based fisheries management; ecosystem‐based management; Fisheries management; fishermen; Principles; stakeholders; A, Atlantic
• ISSN: 1467-2960; 1467-2979
• DOI: 10.1111/faf.12175

Despite the growing popularity of ecosystem‐based management (EBM) in national legislation and in research and institutional literature, there is often an implementation gap ‘on the ground’, impeding widespread adoption in fisheries. This gap reflects in part the differing understandings of EBM held by fishermen and by management institutions. To explore and seek to close this gap, the underlying principles of EBM considered priorities by fishermen were systematically compared with the priorities identified in the published literature. The fishermen's priorities were determined by asking Atlantic Canadian fishermen to identify the EBM principles they consider most important. Four priority principles were identified: Sustainability, Stakeholder Involvement, Develop Long‐Term Objectives and Use of All Forms of Knowledge. The latter two were not frequently noted as priorities in the literature, while some literature priorities were less commonly chosen by fishermen, indicating a significant difference in perspectives on EBM. The rationale for fishermen's choice of priorities was explored by analysing the fishery management issues they raised – many directly connected to the above four priorities. In addition, another principle, Commit to Principles of Equity, often arose as an implicit priority among fishermen. We suggest that success in implementation of EBM may depend on reconciling differing priorities among its underlying principles, and combining knowledge and expertise from fishermen with research and institutional sources. The comparative methodology used here, which could be replicated elsewhere, should lead to better recognition of local challenges in EBM implementation and encourage support for EBM, to further its contribution to sustainable fisheries.