Influence of transducer frequency on Doppler microemboli signals in an in vivo model

The purpose of this study was the comparison between 1MHz and 2 MHz transducers in the detection of Doppler microembolic signals (MES). Intraoperative monitoring was performed over the arterial tubing of the extracorporal circulation circuit in 10 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurological research (New York) Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 198 - 200
Main Authors: Georgiadis, D., Wenzel, A., Zerkowski, H.R., Zierz, S., Lindner, A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Taylor & Francis 01-04-1998
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was the comparison between 1MHz and 2 MHz transducers in the detection of Doppler microembolic signals (MES). Intraoperative monitoring was performed over the arterial tubing of the extracorporal circulation circuit in 10 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery; using a pulsed ultrasound machine (DWL X-4). 1MHz and 2 MHz probes were mounted to insonate sequential tubing segments and all monitoring sessions saved on digital audio tapes (DAT). MES counts and intensity as detected by each probe were subsequently evaluated. Specific interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen1s kappa-statistic. Time delay in the appearance of MES between the transducers was minimal (0-0.1 msec). A total of5293 (64%) MES were detected by both probes, 2796 (33.8%) only with the 1MHz and 181 (2.2%) only with the 2 MHz probe. Significant differences in MES intensity were evident when comparing the 1MHz to the 2 MHz transducer (16.4 ± 0.1 and 11 ± 0.1 dB with the 1MHz and 2 MHz transducers respectively, P< 0.0001). Specific interobserver agreement was satisfactory (k= 0.78). Use of 1MHz instead of 2 MHz transducers increases the yield of embolus detection in vitro. Evaluation of the applicability and performance of this transducer in clinical settings is warranted. [Neural Res 1998; 20: 198-200]
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-6412
1743-1328
DOI:10.1080/01616412.1998.11740506