Telehealth Use for Enhancing the Health of Rural Older Adults: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review

• Published in: The Gerontologist Vol. 62; no. 10; pp. e564 - e577
• Main Authors: Rush, Kathy L, Singh, Sarah, Seaton, Cherisse L, Burton, Lindsay, Li, Eric, Jones, Charlotte, Davis, Jennifer C, Hasan, Khalad, Kern, Brodie, Janke, Robert
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Oxford University Press 30-11-2022
• Subjects: Acceptance; Costs; Effectiveness; Elder care; Health care delivery; Health care expenditures; Health education; Health research; Health services; Older people; Patients; Research design; Rural health care; Systematic review; Technology; Telemedicine; Tests; Tele-healthcare; health promotion; cost; technology acceptance model
• ISSN: 0016-9013; 1758-5341
• DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnab141

Telehealth holds potential for inclusive and cost-saving healthcare; however, a better understanding of the use and acceptance of telehealth for health promotion among rural older adults is needed. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence for telehealth use among rural-living older adults and to explore cost-effectiveness for health systems and patients.
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Study designs reporting health promotion telehealth interventions with rural-living adults aged 55+ were eligible for review. Following screening and inclusion, articles were quality rated and ranked by level of evidence. Data extraction was guided by the Technology Acceptance Model and organized into outcomes related to ease of use, usefulness, intention to use, and usage behavior along with cost-effectiveness.
Of 2,247 articles screened, 42 were included. Positive findings for the usefulness of telehealth for promoting rural older adults' health were reported in 37 studies. Evidence for ease of use and usage behavior was mixed. Five studies examined intention to continue to use telehealth, and in four of these patients preferred telehealth. Telehealth was cost-effective for healthcare delivery (as a process) compared to face-to-face. However, findings were mixed for cost-effectiveness with both reports of savings (e.g., reduced travel) and increased costs (e.g., insurance).
Telehealth was useful for promoting health among rural-living older adults. Technological supports are needed to improve telehealth ease of use and adherence. Cost-effectiveness of telehealth needs more study, particularly targeting older adults.