Single plus one port robotic radical prostatectomy (SPORP); Initial experience

• Published in: Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia Vol. 89; no. 3; pp. 178 - 181
• Main Authors: Tugcu, Volkan, Simsek, Abdulmuttalip, Evren, Ismail, Seker, Kamil Gokhan, Kocakaya, Ramazan, Torer, Bugra Dogukan, Atar, Arda, Tasci, Ali Ihsan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Italy PAGEPress Publications 03-10-2017
• Subjects: Aged; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Initial experience; Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology; Laparoscopy - methods; Male; Margins of Excision; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Prostate cancer; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood; Prostatectomy - methods; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods; Single plus one port robotic radical prostatectomy (SPORP)
• ISSN: 1124-3562; 2282-4197
• DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2017.3.178

This article reports on patients with early stage prostate cancer treated with single plus one port robotic radical prostatectomy (SPORP).
Since January 2014, we performed SPORP in 8 patients with localized prostate cancer. Age of patients, clinical stage, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, blood loss, histopathological evaluation, postoperative continence, serum level of PSA were evaluated.
Mean age of the 8 patients was 59.85 years. All operations were completed without conversion to standard robotic procedure or open surgery. No intra operative complications occurred. Mean operating time was 143 minutes; prostate excision 123 minutes and urethrovesical anastomosis 20 minutes. Mean blood loss was 45 ml. Preoperative Gleason scores were (3 + 4) in one patient and (3 + 3) in 7 patients. Postoperative Gleason scores were (3 + 4) in 2 patients, and (3 + 3) in 6 patients. All these 8 cases were in T1c clinical stage. Early postoperative complications were drain leakage (n = 1), atelectasis (n = 1), wound infection (n = 1) and fever (n = 1). There was no positive surgical margin. The serum level of PSA was less than 0.2 ng/ml and no other complications happened during the 4 to 12 months follow-up period. Postoperative continence and cosmetic results were excellent.
It is relatively easy for urologists who are skilled in traditional laparoscopic and robotic surgeries to master SPORP. However long-term outcomes of this surgery need further investigations.