Inter-observer evaluation of a GPU-based multicriteria optimization algorithm combined with plan navigation tools for HDR brachytherapy

• Published in: Brachytherapy Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 551 - 560
• Main Authors: Bélanger, Cédric, Poulin, Éric, Aubin, Sylviane, Vigneault, Éric, Martin, André-Guy, Foster, William, Beaulieu, Luc
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-07-2022
• Subjects: GPU; High-dose-rate brachytherapy; Inter-observer study; Multicriteria optimization; Plan navigation; Prostate cancer; High-dose-rate brachytherapy; Multicriteria optimization; Plan navigation; Prostate cancer; GPU; Inter-observer study
• ISSN: 1538-4721; 1873-1449
• DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.003

Recently, a GPU-based multicriteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm was integrated in a graphical user interface (gMCO-GUI) that allowed real-time plan navigation through a set of Pareto-optimal plans for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. This work reports on the inter-observer evaluation of the gMCO algorithm into the clinical workflow.
Twenty HDR brachytherapy prostate cancer patients were retrospectively replanned with the gMCO algorithm. The reference clinical plans were each generated by experienced physicists using inverse planning followed by graphical optimization and approved by a radiation oncologist (RO). Each case was replanned with the gMCO algorithm by generating 2000 Pareto-optimal plans with four different objective functions. Two physicists were asked to rank the objective functions according to their preferences by choosing one preferred plan for each plans pool and ranking them using gMCO-GUI. The optimized dwell positions and dwell times of the gMCO plans that were ranked first were exported to Oncentra Prostate where a blinded comparison of the gMCO plans with the clinical plans was conducted by three ROs.
The median planning time of the two physicists was 9 min. Both physicists preferred the objective function with target sub-regions to cover specific target regions. Regarding the blinded comparison, the gMCO plans were preferred 19, 17, and 12 times by the three ROs, in which eight gMCO plans were unanimously preferred compared with the clinical plans.
The plan quality and the planning time were similar between the two physicists and within what is observed in the clinic. Moreover, the gMCO plans evaluated favorably by ROs compared to the reference clinical plans.