Center variation in episode-of-care costs for adult spinal deformity surgery: results from a prospective, multicenter database

• Published in: The spine journal Vol. 18; no. 10; pp. 1829 - 1836
• Main Authors: Yeramaneni, Samrat, Ames, Christopher P., Bess, Shay, Burton, Doug, Smith, Justin S., Glassman, Steven, Gum, Jeffrey L., Carreon, Leah, Jain, Amit, Zygourakis, Corinna, Avramis, Ioannis, Hostin, Richard
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-10-2018
• Subjects: Bundled payments; Direct costs; HRQoL; Resource utilization; Scoliosis; Value; Value; Bundled payments; HRQoL; Resource utilization; Direct costs; Scoliosis
• ISSN: 1529-9430; 1878-1632
• DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.012

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is associated with significant resource utilization, costing more than $958 million in charges for Medicare patients and more than $1.7 billion in charges for managed care population in the last decade. Given the recent move toward bundled payment models, it is important to understand the various care components a patient receives over the course of a defined clinical episode, its associated cost, and the proportion of cost for each component toward the bundled payment.
To examine the degree and determinants of variation in inpatient episode-of-care (EOC) cost, resource utilization, and patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing ASD surgery across four spine deformity centers in the United States.
Retrospective analysis of prospective, multicenter database.
Consecutive patients enrolled in an ASD database from four spinal deformity centers.
Total in-patient EOC costs and Short Form (SF)-6D.
The study used a multicenter database of 210 consecutively enrolled operative patients from 2008 to 2013 at four participating centers in the United States. Demographic, surgical, and direct cost data, expressed in 2013 dollars, for the entire inpatient EOC were obtained from administrative databases from the respective hospitals. Mixed models and multivariable linear regression were used to evaluate the impact of center on total costs adjusting for patient characteristics, length of stay (LOS), and surgical factors.
A total of 126 patients with complete baseline and 2-year follow-up data were included. The percentages of patients from each center were 36.5%, 7.1%, 24.6%, and 31.7%. Overall, the mean patient age was 58.4±12.6 years, 86% were women, and 94% were Caucasian. The proportion of total cost variation explained by the center at which the patient was treated was 17%. After adjusting for patient, LOS, and surgical factors the cost variation reduced to 4%. In multivariable analysis, each additional level fused increased total cost variation by $2,500, whereas recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP) use and posterior-only surgical approach lowered total EOC costs by $10,500 and $9,400, respectively. No significant difference was observed in 2-year quality-adjusted life year across centers.
Total EOC costs for ASD surgery varied significantly by center. Levels fused, BMP use, and surgical approach were the primary drivers of cost variation across centers. Differences in resource utilization had no impact on 2-year quality-adjusted life year improvement across centers.