Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Mitomycin, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Study of the Italian Lung Cancer Project

To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIC) chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIB (limited to T4 for pleural effusion and N3 for supraclavicular lymph nodes) or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The end points were the evaluation of quality...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 17; no. 11; pp. 3522 - 3530
Main Authors: CRINO, L, SCAGLIOTTI, G. V, SASSI, M, BARNI, S, RAVAIOLI, A, ADAMO, V, PORTALONE, L, CRUCIANI, G, MASOTTI, A, FERRARA, G, GOZZELINO, F, TONATO, M, RICCI, S, DE MARINIS, F, RINALDI, M, GRIDELLI, C, CERIBELLI, A, BIANCO, R, MARANGOLO, M, DI COSTANZO, F
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Baltimore, MD American Society of Clinical Oncology 01-11-1999
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIC) chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIB (limited to T4 for pleural effusion and N3 for supraclavicular lymph nodes) or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The end points were the evaluation of quality of life (QoL), response rates, survival, and toxicity. Three hundred seven patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 28 days, or mitomycin 6 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 3,000 mg/m(2), and mesna on day 1 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 28 days. The whole-blood cell count was repeated on day 1 in both arms and weekly in the GC arm before each gemcitabine administration. No major differences in changes in QoL were observed between the two treatment arms. The objective response rate was 38% in the GC arm compared with 26% in the MIC arm (P =.029). The median survival time was 8.6 months in the GC arm and 9.6 months in the MIC arm (P =.877, log-rank test). Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly worse in the GC arm (64% v 28%, P <.001), whereas grade 3 and 4 alopecia was reported more commonly in the MIC arm (39% v 12%, P <. 001). We report an increased response rate without changes in QoL and a similar overall survival, time to progression, and time to treatment failure for the GC when compared with the MIC regimen in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3522