Incidental findings on brain MRI in a cohort of diabetic patients

To study the frequency and management of incidental findings in nonenhanced brain MRI of a middle-aged population of type 2 diabetic patients. We retrospectively analyzed the results of 289 brain MRI obtained from subjects between 40–75 years recruited from a previous study. Incidental findings were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neuroradiology Vol. 47; no. 5; pp. 343 - 348
Main Authors: Vázquez-Justes, D., Sanahuja, J., Diez, J., Rubinat, E., Begué, R., Salas, C., Vicandi, C., Gil, M.I., Purroy, F., Mauricio, D.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: France Elsevier Masson SAS 01-09-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To study the frequency and management of incidental findings in nonenhanced brain MRI of a middle-aged population of type 2 diabetic patients. We retrospectively analyzed the results of 289 brain MRI obtained from subjects between 40–75 years recruited from a previous study. Incidental findings were classified into three categories: (1) Vascular findings; (2) neoplastic findings; and (3) others. On the other side, we made a classification of referral findings. To compare our results, we reviewed the prevalence and evidence about management of both incidental and referral findings in other series. We found an overall prevalence of incidental findings of 10.4% (30/289). Incidental findings raised according to age. The most common incidental findings were: 7 vascular (2.4%), 6 calcifications (2.1%), 6 cystic (2.1%) and 5 neoplastic (1.7%) lesions. A percentage of 1.7% (5/289) were referral findings which required further clinical work-up. Incidental findings are relatively common in patients with type 2 diabetes. The most frequent are vascular findings, accordance with previous studies. Referral findings are uncommon. Clinical evidence about how to best manage the majority of incidental findings is lacking.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0150-9861
DOI:10.1016/j.neurad.2018.07.005