Occurrence, bioaccumulation, fate, and risk assessment of novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs) in aquatic environments — A critical review

• Published in: Water research (Oxford) Vol. 198; p. 117168
• Main Authors: Hou, Rui, Lin, Lang, Li, Hengxiang, Liu, Shan, Xu, Xiangrong, Xu, Yiping, Jin, Xiaowei, Yuan, Yong, Wang, Zijian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 15-06-2021
• Subjects: Aquatic environments; Bioaccumulation; Novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs); Persistence; Risk assessment; Persistence; Novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs); Bioaccumulation; Aquatic environments; Risk assessment
• ISSN: 0043-1354; 1879-2448
• DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117168

•NBFRs frequently present higher concentrations than the legacy BFRs in sediments.•NBFRs showed high bioaccumulation properties but weak metabolic activities in aquatic animals.•Sorption rather than biotransformation determines their fate in the aquatic environment.•Source emission areas are the compartments most vulnerable to NBFR risks.•The environmental safety in substitution of legacy BFRs by NBFRs need to be further evaluated.
[Display omitted]
Novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs), which have been developed as replacements for legacy flame retardants such as polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), are a class of alternative flame retardants with emerging and widespread applications. The ubiquitous occurrence of NBFRs in the aquatic environments and the potential adverse effects on aquatic organisms have initiated intense global concerns. The present article, therefore, identifies and analyzes the current state of knowledge on the occurrence, bioaccumulation, fates, and environmental and health risks of NBFRs in aquatic environments. The key findings from this review are that (1) the distribution of NBFRs are source-dependent in the global aquatic environments, and several NBFRs have been reported at higher concentrations than that of the legacy flame retardants; (2) high bioaccumulative properties have been found for all of the discussed NBFRs due to their strong hydrophobic characteristics and weak metabolic rates; (3) the limited information available suggests that NBFRs are resistant to biotic and abiotic degradation processes and that sorption to sludge and sediments are the main fate of NBFRs in the aquatic environments; (4) the results of ecological risk assessments have indicated the potential risks of NBFRs and have suggested that source areas are the most vulnerable environmental compartments. Knowledge gaps and perspectives for future research regarding the monitoring, toxicokinetics, transformation processes, and development of ecological risk assessments of NBFRs in aquatic environments are proposed.