Update on the role of pathology and laboratory medicine in diagnosing periprosthetic infection

• Published in: Human pathology Vol. 147; pp. 5 - 14
• Main Authors: Mazzella, Fermina M, Zhang, Yaxia, Bauer, Thomas W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-05-2024
• Subjects: Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects; Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation; Humans; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis; Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology; Infection; Arthroplasty; Diagnostic tests; Periprosthetic infection
• ISSN: 0046-8177; 1532-8392; 1532-8392
• DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2024.01.009

Technological and implant design advances have helped reduce the frequency of aseptic total joint arthroplasty failure, but periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) remain a clinical important problem with high patient morbidity. Misinterpreting PJI as aseptic mechanical loosening commonly leads to unsatisfactory revision arthroplasty, persistent infection, and poor long-term results. While there is no single "gold standard" diagnostic test for PJI, recent collaborative efforts by Orthopaedic and Infectious Disease Societies have developed algorithms for diagnosing PJI. However, the efficacy of individual tests as well as diagnostic thresholds are controversial. We review the recommended thresholds for commonly used screening tests as well as tissue histopathology and confirmatory tests to diagnose periprosthetic infection. We also update lesser-known laboratory tests, and we briefly summarize rapidly evolving molecular tests to diagnose periprosthetic infection. Pathologists hold a critical role in assisting with PJI diagnosis, maintaining laboratory test quality and interpreting test results. Collaboration between clinicians and pathologists is essential to provide optimal patient care and reduce the burden of PJI.