The influence of temporal variability and reservoir management on demand-response in the water sector
Urban water systems can be highly energy intensive. Yet, they are also excellent candidates for demand-response since they possess readily controllable operations and large amounts of storage. However, real-worlds trials have delivered mixed results, which implies the need to understand the underlyi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied energy Vol. 305; p. 117808 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
01-01-2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Urban water systems can be highly energy intensive. Yet, they are also excellent candidates for demand-response since they possess readily controllable operations and large amounts of storage. However, real-worlds trials have delivered mixed results, which implies the need to understand the underlying mechanisms of flexibility in water operations. This paper studies the potential to shift energy demand in an urban water system located in the River Thames basin, a region encompassing the city of London, England. Results show that the system could theoretically shift up to 20.1% of its annual energy demand for pumping (2.1 GWh), saving the local water utility around £5.6 million in electricity costs. However, the water system’s flexibility is shown to be highly variable due to the variability in water demands and electricity prices, in-turn affecting the financial returns from demand-response. Sensitivity analysis reveals that factors such as the seasonal reservoir control strategies and total storage capacity are key determinants of system flexibility. A relationship between water storage capacity and flexibility is also derived, which could be used to estimate water sector flexibility in other regions.
•Potential for demand-side response studied in London water supply system.•Dynamics in demands, prices and reservoir management are modelled.•Results showed substantial cost reduction as 2.5–20.1% of demand could be shifted.•Benefits of flexibility are volatile due to variability in water system.•Trade-offs between operational risk and flexibility are explored. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-2619 1872-9118 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117808 |