Position statement: topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis

Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease in both adults and children. Whilst topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream, have proven efficacy for the treatment of AD, it is important to involve experts to obtain their opinion on i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vol. 32; no. 12; pp. 2074 - 2082
Main Authors: Remitz, A., De Pità, O., Mota, A., Serra‐Baldrich, E., Vakirlis, E., Kapp, A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England 01-12-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease in both adults and children. Whilst topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream, have proven efficacy for the treatment of AD, it is important to involve experts to obtain their opinion on its optimal treatment. Objective Using a modified Delphi approach, this project aimed to generate consensus amongst experts on the use of TCIs in the treatment of AD, with a focus on the differentiation between tacrolimus and pimecrolimus. Methods Six expert dermatologists from different European countries participated in this project based on their experience with AD and its treatment, which was evaluated by literature analysis and expert opinion. Consensus amongst the experts was generated using a modified Delphi approach, consisting of three distinct phases, during which a web meeting (June 2017), two online rounds of blinded Delphi voting (July–September 2017) and a face‐to‐face meeting (November 2017) were conducted. The consensus statements concerned two main topics: (i) Background of AD; and (ii) TCIs in AD. Hot topics in the treatment of AD not supported by meta‐analysis, clinical trials or large observational studies were also discussed based on clinical experience. Results In total, 25 consensus statements were defined and validated: eight statements on the general background of AD and 17 statements on the use of TCIs in AD, including their mechanism of action and therapeutic indications in AD, efficacy in adult and paediatric AD patients, pharmacokinetics, incidence of adverse events and safety concerns. Hot topics on the use of TCIs for the treatment of AD included cream vs. ointment, dosages, TCIs contact allergy, burning sensation management, superinfection and vaccination concerns. Conclusion Topical calcineurin inhibitors are a suitable therapy for AD, and selection of the specific TCI should be based on factors which differentiate tacrolimus from pimecrolimus.
Bibliography:Conflicts of interest
This project was funded by LEO Pharma.
Whilst LEO Pharma is the manufacturer of tacrolimus ointment and the supporter of the project, there was no industry bias and the manuscript contents reflect entirely the Authors’ opinions without any influence by the sponsor. AR declares she has been involved in clinical studies, consultations and lectures by Astellas Pharma, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi and Roche. AM declares he has been involved in lectures and consultations by Astellas Pharma and LEO Pharma. ESB declares she has been involved in clinical studies, consultations and lectures by Novartis, Sanofi, Pierre FAbre, GSK and LEO Pharma. EV received lecture honoraria from Novartis, LEO Pharma, Meda Pharmaceuticals, Pierre Fabre, La Roche Posay and Hippocrates Sintech, and participated in clinical trials from Genesis, AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen and Sanofi. AK and ODP declare no conflict of interests.
Funding source
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Conference-3
ObjectType-Feature-5
ObjectType-Article-4
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.15272