Graft survival and postoperative complications following orthotopic renal transplantation

The iliac fossa is the most commonly used site to place the graft in renal transplantation in adults. However, iliac fossa may not be used in various conditions. Thus, orthotopic renal transplantation becomes a viable alternative for these selected patients. Given the technically challenging surgery...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical transplantation Vol. 38; no. 1; pp. e15220 - n/a
Main Authors: Territo, Angelo, Selvi, İsmail, Malçok, Aydan, Boissier, Romain, Campi, Riccardo, Prudhomme, Thomas, Pecoraro, Alessio, Piana, Alberto, Lopez‐Abad, Alicia, Bañuelos Marco, Beatriz, Breda, Alberto, Dönmez, M. İrfan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Denmark 01-01-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The iliac fossa is the most commonly used site to place the graft in renal transplantation in adults. However, iliac fossa may not be used in various conditions. Thus, orthotopic renal transplantation becomes a viable alternative for these selected patients. Given the technically challenging surgery and limited number of patients, data on the long‐term outcomes on this regard are scarce. This narrative review serves as an update on the clinical outcomes after orthotopic renal transplantation, focusing on overall recipient survival and renal graft survival, as well as postoperative complications. We found that studies to date showed a comparable survival rate in both recipients and renal grafts in the postoperative follow‐up period after orthotopic renal transplantation with a lower complication rate compared to the published data on heterotopic renal transplantation. The results of our review may encourage transplant centers to reevaluate their policies to consider orthotopic renal transplantation as an alternative technique in cases where heterotopic kidney transplantation is not possible.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0902-0063
1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/ctr.15220