Chemical crosslinking of polyethylene and its effect on water tree initiation and propagation

• Published in: IEEE transactions on dielectrics and electrical insulation Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 709 - 715
• Main Authors: Ciuprina, Florin, Teissèdre, Gisèle, Filippini, Jean César, Smedberg, Annika, Campus, Alfred, Hampton, Nigel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York IEEE 01-06-2010; The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE); Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
• Subjects: Additives; Cable insulation; Chemical compounds; Chemical engineering; Cross linked polyethylene insulation; Crosslinking; Density; Electric power; Electric resistance; Engineering Sciences; Laboratories; Peroxides; Polyethylene; Polyethylenes; Polymers; Power cables; Propagation (polymerization); Statistical methods; Thermoplastic resins; Trees; Trees - insulation; water trees
• ISSN: 1070-9878; 1558-4135
• DOI: 10.1109/TDEI.2010.5492242

The water tree resistance of chemically crosslinked polyethylene and of low density polyethylene were compared in order to elucidate whether the crosslinking itself influences or not the water tree characteristics of polymeric cable insulation materials. For this purpose, water trees were grown in compression moulded disks, obtained from pellets of either thermoplastic or chemically crosslinked polyethylene. Three types of crosslinked polyethylene were evaluated: one containing only peroxide (XLA) and two others having, besides peroxide, a tree retarding additive system (XLB and XLC), and the results were compared with those obtained on their thermoplastic correspondents (A, B and C). Results were determined for both Water Tree Propagation and Water Tree Initiation. The results obtained for Water Tree Propagation indicate that there is generally a large difference between the types (A, B & C) yet only small difference between thermoplastic and crosslinked samples. However for two cases (A & B) these small differences between crosslinking are statistically significant. The complementary Water Tree Initiation results show both large and significant differences between material types and the crosslinking.