Comparisons of patient self-report, neurologic examination, and functional impairment in MS

• Published in: Neurology Vol. 56; no. 7; pp. 934 - 937
• Main Authors: HOOGERVORST, E. L. J, VAN WINSEN, L. M. L, EIKELENBOOM, M. J, KALKERS, N. F, UITDEHAAG, B. M. J, POLMAN, C. H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10-04-2001
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biological and medical sciences; Disability Evaluation; Humans; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology; Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis; Neurologic Examination; Neurology; Self-Assessment; Handicap; Human; Nervous system diseases; Multiple sclerosis; Evaluation scale; Patient; Psychometrics; Cognition; Disability Status Scale for Multiple Sclerosis Kurtzke; Inflammatory disease; Disability; Central nervous system disease; Comparative study
• ISSN: 0028-3878; 1526-632X
• DOI: 10.1212/WNL.56.7.934

To compare the recently developed Guy's Neurologic Disability Scale (GNDS), based on patient self-report, with both neurologist rating of neurologic examination abnormalities using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and observations of functional impairment on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) in the assessment of disease impact in MS.
Two hundred ninety MS patients were recruited at an outpatient clinic. Impairment and disability were assessed using GNDS, EDSS, and MSFC. Correlations between GNDS, EDSS, MSFC, and their corresponding components were studied for the total population, MS phenotypes, and three disability strata.
Mean scores were 4.6 (SD, 2.0) for EDSS, 0.0 (SD, 0.8) for MSFC, and 14.6 (SD, 7.9) for GNDS. Good correlations were found between GNDS and EDSS (r = 0.73), between GNDS and MSFC (r = -0.68), and between different subcategories of the GNDS and EDSS, MSFC, and their corresponding components. Remarkably good correlations were found between lower limb function and all three scales. Poor correlations were also found, especially between different measurements focusing on cognitive function.
The good correlations between GNDS and both EDSS and MSFC were mainly due to the importance of spinal-cord-related neurologic functions in all three scoring systems. A marked discrepancy was found for the assessment of cognition between objective measurements and subjective complaints. Because patients' self-reporting correlates well with results of physical examination, GNDS can offer a valuable way to measure disease impact in MS. However, GNDS is not an adequate screen of cognitive dysfunction.