Challenger Quality and the Incumbency Advantage
Most estimates of the incumbency advantage and the electoral benefits of previous officeholding experience do not account for strategic entry by high-quality challengers. We address this issue by using term limits as an instrument for challenger quality. Studying US state legislatures, we find stron...
Saved in:
Published in: | Legislative studies quarterly Vol. 41; no. 1; pp. 153 - 179 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Iowa City
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-02-2016
Department of Political Science at Washington University in St. Louis Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Most estimates of the incumbency advantage and the electoral benefits of previous officeholding experience do not account for strategic entry by high-quality challengers. We address this issue by using term limits as an instrument for challenger quality. Studying US state legislatures, we find strong evidence of strategic behavior by experienced challengers. However, we also find that such behavior does not appear to significantly bias the estimated effect of challenger experience or the estimated incumbency advantage. More tentatively, using our estimates, we find that 30-40% of the incumbency advantage in state legislative races is the result of "scaring off' experienced challengers. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:BB6E1CF7934C4CEA192378495E8B0A03C0ADE58F ark:/67375/WNG-DM0PD10F-G ArticleID:LSQ12109 |
ISSN: | 0362-9805 1939-9162 |
DOI: | 10.1111/lsq.12109 |