Error monitoring and empathy: Explorations within a neurophysiological context

Past literature has proposed that empathy consists of two components: cognitive and affective empathy. Error monitoring mechanisms indexed by the error‐related negativity (ERN) have been associated with empathy. Studies have found that a larger ERN is associated with higher levels of empathy. We aim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychophysiology Vol. 54; no. 6; pp. 864 - 873
Main Authors: Amiruddin, Azhani, Fueggle, Simone N., Nguyen, An T., Gignac, Gilles E., Clunies‐Ross, Karen L., Fox, Allison M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-06-2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Past literature has proposed that empathy consists of two components: cognitive and affective empathy. Error monitoring mechanisms indexed by the error‐related negativity (ERN) have been associated with empathy. Studies have found that a larger ERN is associated with higher levels of empathy. We aimed to expand upon previous work by investigating how error monitoring relates to the independent theoretical domains of cognitive and affective empathy. Study 1 (N = 24) explored the relationship between error monitoring mechanisms and subcomponents of empathy using the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy and found no relationship. Study 2 (N = 38) explored the relationship between the error monitoring mechanisms and overall empathy. Contrary to past findings, there was no evidence to support a relationship between error monitoring mechanisms and scores on empathy measures. A subsequent meta‐analysis (Study 3, N = 125) summarizing the relationship across previously published studies together with the two studies reported in the current paper indicated that overall there was no significant association between ERN and empathy and that there was significant heterogeneity across studies. Future investigations exploring the potential variables that may moderate these relationships are discussed.
Bibliography:The University of Western Australia, School of Psychology, provided the equipment for the study, and AA was financially supported by the MARA Scholarship.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-5772
1469-8986
1540-5958
DOI:10.1111/psyp.12846