Analysis of Abdominal Dermal‐Fat Grafting to Repair Parotidectomy Defects: An 18‐Year Cohort Study

Objectives To assess the outcomes of abdominal dermal‐fat grafting following superficial and total parotidectomy. Methods A retrospective chart review of parotidectomy patients was performed. Patients were divided into four groups based on surgical extent and grafting status: superficial parotidecto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope Vol. 130; no. 9; pp. 2144 - 2147
Main Authors: Gruszczynski, Nelson R., Anderies, Barrett J., Dey, Jacob K., Price, Daniel L., Moore, Eric J., Janus, Jeffrey R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-09-2020
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives To assess the outcomes of abdominal dermal‐fat grafting following superficial and total parotidectomy. Methods A retrospective chart review of parotidectomy patients was performed. Patients were divided into four groups based on surgical extent and grafting status: superficial parotidectomy (SP), superficial parotidectomy with grafting (SPg), total parotidectomy (TP), and total parotidectomy with grafting (TPg). Complication rates and operative times were then compared between surgically matched groups (SP vs. SPg, TP vs. TPg). Complications included graft necrosis, gustatory sweating, first‐bite syndrome, infection, hematoma, sialocele, and seroma. Data was analyzed via chi‐square and two‐sample t testing, logistic regression, and one‐way analysis of variance. Results The cohort consisted of 330 patients: 106 SP (32.12%), 61 SPg (18.48%), 82 TP (24.85%), and 81 TPg (24.55%). No donor site complications occurred. TPg resulted in seven graft necroses (8.64%), and 22 reported gustatory sweating (27.20% vs. 10 TP patients (12.2%), P = 0.016); SPg resulted in two necroses (3.28%). There were no other statistically significant differences in complication rates. Graft recipients receiving adjuvant radiation were more likely to develop necrosis (odds ratio [OR] 4.60, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–18.27, P = .0194). Patients who developed gustatory sweating were 8.38 years younger (95% CI 2.66–14.10, P = 0.002, follow‐up time > 48 days). Grafting did not increase operative times (TP/TPg: mean = 275.91/263.65 minutes, standard error of the mean = 41.96/33.75, P = 0.822). Conclusion An abdominal dermal‐fat graft is an excellent reconstructive choice for a parotidectomy defect and is not associated with increased complication rates or prolonged operative time. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 130:2144–2147, 2020
Bibliography:Editor's Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication on November 22, 2019.
The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.28466