Robot tutor and pupils’ educational ability: Teaching the times tables

Research shows promising results of educational robots in language and STEM tasks. In language, more research is available, occasionally in view of individual differences in pupils’ educational ability levels, and learning seems to improve with more expressive robot behaviors. In STEM, variations in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers and education Vol. 157; p. 103970
Main Authors: Konijn, Elly A., Hoorn, Johan F.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01-11-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Research shows promising results of educational robots in language and STEM tasks. In language, more research is available, occasionally in view of individual differences in pupils’ educational ability levels, and learning seems to improve with more expressive robot behaviors. In STEM, variations in robots’ behaviors have been examined with inconclusive results and never while systematically investigating how differences in educational abilities match with different robot behaviors. We applied an autonomously tutoring robot (without tablet, partly WOz) in a 2 × 2 experiment of social vs. neutral behavior in above-average vs. below-average schoolchildren (N = 86; age 8–10 years) while rehearsing the multiplication tables on a one-to-one basis. The standard school test showed that on average, pupils significantly improved their performance even after 3 occasions of 5-min exercises. Beyond-average pupils profited most from a robot tutor, whereas those below average in multiplication benefited more from a robot that showed neutral rather than more social behavior. •One-to-one robot tutoring benefits learning the multiplication tables.•We suggest to differentiate robot tutoring, according to the level of advancement.•A more social robot is not always the better teacher.•We discuss that robot-teacher partnerships may shape the future of pedagogy.
ISSN:0360-1315
1873-782X
DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103970