Two Surgical Techniques for Essure Device Ablation: The Hysteroscopic Way and the Laparoscopic Way by Salpingectomy with Tubal Interstitial Resection
To describe 2 different surgical techniques for Essure removal on the same patient: the hysteroscopic and laparoscopic techniques. An educational video approved by the local institutional review board (Canadian Task Force classification III). A university hospital (University Hospital of Strasbourg,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Vol. 26; no. 4; p. 603 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01-05-2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To describe 2 different surgical techniques for Essure removal on the same patient: the hysteroscopic and laparoscopic techniques.
An educational video approved by the local institutional review board (Canadian Task Force classification III).
A university hospital (University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France).
A 46-year-old woman with many symptoms after Essure device implantation. An ultrasound found a right implant in the uterine cavity and a left intratubal implant.
The first step was the hysteroscopic removal of the right implant. We viewed the 2 internal and external spirals, allowing the gripping of the whole device without risking any fragmentation or tubal lesion. The second step was bilateral salpingectomy with resection of the left interstitial tubal portion. We longitudinally incised the antimesial edge of the fallopian tube 2 to 3 cm from the tubal serous to the implant contact. A circumferential incision was performed at the uterine horn to circumscribe the interstitial tubal portion. The implant was released from the surrounding tissue. It was gently pulled to completely extract it and avoid spiral fragmentation. Then, we performed a bilateral total salpingectomy. An X-ray of the implants and pelvis was performed to ensure complete removal of the device. We made an X-stitch in the uterine horn to avoid the risk of fistula.
More and more patients are asking for the removal of their implants. The surgical technique has to be adapted to the location of the implants and has to allow their complete removal to avoid leaving fragments that can cause the persistence of side effects. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Case Study-3 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-5 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Report-2 ObjectType-Article-4 |
ISSN: | 1553-4650 1553-4669 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.017 |