Esophageal motility and impedance characteristics in patients with Barrett’s esophagus before and after radiofrequency ablation

INTRODUCTIONRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a valuable treatment option in Barrett’s esophagus resulting in eradication of dysplasia and conversion of all Barrett’s epithelium into normal squamous epithelium. In Barrett’s esophagus, esophageal impedance monitoring is hampered by low baseline impeda...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology Vol. 25; no. 9; pp. 1024 - 1032
Main Authors: Hemmink, Gerrit J.M, Alvarez Herrero, Lorenza, Bogte, Auke, Bredenoord, Albert J, Bergman, Jaques J, Smout, André J.P.M, Weusten, Bas L.A.M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01-09-2013
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:INTRODUCTIONRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a valuable treatment option in Barrett’s esophagus resulting in eradication of dysplasia and conversion of all Barrett’s epithelium into normal squamous epithelium. In Barrett’s esophagus, esophageal impedance monitoring is hampered by low baseline impedance values. Whether these low baselines are caused by an intrinsically low impedance of cylindrical epithelium or by the excessive reflux itself is hitherto unknown. Data on esophageal motility after RFA are scarce. Our aim was to examine the effect of RFA on esophageal motility and esophageal baseline impedance in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. METHODSIn 10 patients, conventional esophageal manometry and 24-h pH-impedance measurements were performed before and after RFA. The number and type of reflux episodes were assessed and baseline impedance values were measured in all recording segments. In another five patients, high-resolution manometry was performed before and after RFA. RESULTSComplete regression of all Barrett’s epithelium was achieved in all 15 patients after 3±1 RFA sessions. Overall, no significant motility changes were found after RFA. Patients had excessive acid exposure times before and after RFA [25 (17–42) and 16 (9–24)%, respectively]. Baseline esophageal impedance values were low, with the lowest values in the distal recording segments. RFA increased baseline impedance in all recording segments in the upright position; in the supine position, the effect just failed to reach statistically significant levels. CONCLUSIONRFA did not alter esophageal motility significantly. Low esophageal baseline impedance levels in patients with Barrett’s esophagus reflect, at least in part, intrinsic impedance properties of cylindrical epithelium, as baselines increased after conversion into neosquamous epithelium.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0954-691X
1473-5687
DOI:10.1097/MEG.0b013e32836283dc