Interval Female Sterilization

Female sterilization is relied on by nearly one in three women aged 35–44 years in the United States. Sterilization procedures are among the most common procedures that obstetrician–gynecologists perform. The most frequent sterilization procedures include postpartum tubal ligation, laparoscopic tuba...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) Vol. 131; no. 1; pp. 117 - 124
Main Authors: Stuart, Gretchen S, Ramesh, Shanthi S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved 01-01-2018
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Female sterilization is relied on by nearly one in three women aged 35–44 years in the United States. Sterilization procedures are among the most common procedures that obstetrician–gynecologists perform. The most frequent sterilization procedures include postpartum tubal ligation, laparoscopic tubal disruption or salpingectomy, and hysteroscopic tubal occlusion. The informed consent process for sterilization is crucial and requires shared decision-making between the patient and the health care provider. Counseling should include the specific risks and benefits of the specific surgical approaches. Additionally, women should be counseled on the alternatives to sterilization, including intrauterine contraceptives and subdermal contraceptive implants. Complications, including unplanned pregnancy after successful female sterilization, are rare. The objectives of this Clinical Expert Series are to describe the epidemiology of female sterilization, access to postpartum sterilization, advances in interval sterilization techniques, and clinical considerations in caring for women requesting sterilization.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0029-7844
1873-233X
DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002376