The efficacy and safety of fire needle for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Medicine (Baltimore) Vol. 100; no. 31; p. e26824
• Main Authors: Xue, Kaiyang, Liu, Hong, Shi, Qiumei, Wang, Xianzhu, He, Yanqin, Cui, Jin, Fu, Jing
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 06-08-2021
• Subjects: Acupuncture Therapy - adverse effects; Acupuncture Therapy - instrumentation; Acupuncture Therapy - methods; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Radiculopathy - etiology; Radiculopathy - therapy; Research Design; Spondylosis - complications; Study Protocol Systematic Review; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0025-7974; 1536-5964
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026824

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is one of the most common types of cervical spondylosis, and its treatments are mainly for relieving radicular pain and improving dysfunction. The existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that fire needle may be a potential therapy in the treatment of CSR, but there is no evidence-based medical evidence to date. Therefore, this study will systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of fire needle in the treatment of CSR.
We will search for 7 electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, Sinomed, and Wanfang Database) and 2 trial registration platforms (ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinic Trials.gov) to collect eligible studies. The RCTs related to fire needle for CSR and published up to June 30, 2021 will be included, regardless of language. We will consider the visual analogue scale as the primary outcome and the secondary outcome will include cervical range of motion, assessment of muscle strength, neck disability index, the MOS item short from health survey, activities of daily living, total efficiency, and adverse reactions. We will use the standard proposed in Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 to assess the quality and bias risk of every RCT, and all analyses will be conducted through RevMan software V5.3 (Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Center, Cochrane, Collaborative Organization, 2014).
This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a convincing synthesis of existing evidences on the efficacy and safety of fire needle for CSR, and the results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.
The results of this study will provide high-quality evidence of fire needle in the treatment of CSR for clinical decision-making.
INPLASY202170041.