Physical, chemical and sensorial properties of healthy and mixture breads in Portugal
This study was conducted to characterize different samples of regional bread made from mixed rye and wheat flours and healthy bread produced from a special formulation. The bread samples were evaluated in terms of their physical, chemical and sensory properties following the standard methods. The re...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of food measurement & characterization Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 70 - 80 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Boston
Springer US
01-06-2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study was conducted to characterize different samples of regional bread made from mixed rye and wheat flours and healthy bread produced from a special formulation. The bread samples were evaluated in terms of their physical, chemical and sensory properties following the standard methods. The regional breads showed some differences in the chemical composition:
Flor de Carregal
had the highest protein content (14.59 %) and the lowest salt content (0.40 %),
Pedregal
had the highest fibre content (0.89 %), and
Pazurara
was the richest in minerals (4.90 %). Although the sensory properties of bread samples were not statistically different,
Flor de Cabanas
obtained the highest overall acceptability among the samples (6.95 points). With respect to the healthy bread samples, slight differences were observed on their physical and sensory properties, which may attributed to their similarity in ingredient compositions. Furthermore, significant differences were observed from the fiber, carbohydrate, protein and chloride contents of healthy bread samples. In comparison with the two types of breads, it was found that they have different chemical, physical and sensory properties. Sensory analysis also showed that regional breads were more preferred by the panellists, with an average punctuation for global appreciation of 5.83 against 4.71. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2193-4126 2193-4134 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11694-013-9166-z |