Experimental evidence on payments for forest commons conservation

Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) represent a popular strategy for environmental protection, and tropical forest conservation in particular. Little is known, however, about their effectiveness. Many argue that even if PES increase conservation while payments last, they may adversely affect other...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature sustainability Vol. 1; no. 3; pp. 128 - 135
Main Authors: Andersson, Krister P., Cook, Nathan J., Grillos, Tara, Lopez, Maria Claudia, Salk, Carl F., Wright, Glenn D., Mwangi, Esther
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01-03-2018
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) represent a popular strategy for environmental protection, and tropical forest conservation in particular. Little is known, however, about their effectiveness. Many argue that even if PES increase conservation while payments last, they may adversely affect other motivations for pro-environmental behaviour in the longer term. We test whether conditional payments also encourage forest users to conserve shared forest resources after payments end. Using a framed field experiment with 1,200 tropical forest users in five countries, we show that (1) during the intervention, conditional payments increased conservation behaviour; (2) after payments stopped, users continued to conserve more on average than they did before the intervention, especially when they were able to communicate with each other; and (3) trust amplified the lasting conservation effects of the interventions. PES effectiveness may increase when interventions facilitate interpersonal communication and when implemented in contexts where forest users enjoy high levels of trust. A framed field experiment in five countries shows that Payments for Ecosystem Services increase forest conservation, that communication contributes to payment effectiveness and that positive effects outlast payments.
ISSN:2398-9629
2398-9629
DOI:10.1038/s41893-018-0034-z