Microhabitat characteristics related to seasonal roost switching: implications from a threatened and introduced cockatoo species in an urban landscape

• Published in: Avian research Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
• Main Authors: Wang, Sifeng, Chu, L. M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Beijing BioMed Central Ltd 28-06-2021; Elsevier Limited; KeAi Communications Co., Ltd
• Subjects: Analysis; Animal behavior; Bats; Birds; Cacatua sulphurea; Communal roosting; Endangered species; Environmental factors; Foraging behavior; Habitats; Human disturbance; Hypotheses; Introduced species; Land use; Microclimate; Microenvironments; Parrots; Physical characteristics; Predation; Roosts; Seasonal variation; Site selection; Social behavior; Summer; Thermoregulation; Threatened species; Urban environments; Wildlife conservation; Winter; Hong Kong; China; Indonesia
• ISSN: 2053-7166; 2053-7166
• DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00270-9

Background Communal roosting is a common avian social behaviour, which potentially provides foraging benefits, predation avoidance or thermoregulation in birds. To identify the crucial environmental factors associated with roost site selection, most studies have focused on the comparison of physical characteristics between roosts and non-roosts. However, the differences among roosts have usually been neglected and the causes of roost switching have seldom been investigated. Methods To explore the variations among roost sites and assess the most influential environmental factors related to seasonal roost switching, we conducted a 105-day observation on an introduced population of critically endangered Yellow-crested Cockatoo (Cacatua sulphurea) in an urban environment in Hong Kong from 2014 to 2016. We identified seven roost sites that were occupied in different seasons and then measured their microhabitat characteristics in terms of land use types, human disturbance and microclimate temperature. To quantify these differences, we used Pearson's chi-squared test, partial least squares determinant analysis (PLS-DA) and one-way repeated measures ANOVA, respectively. Results Our results distinguished roost sites occupied in three seasons, i.e. spring, summer and winter roosts, using several microhabitat characteristics. The land use types were significantly associated with roosts, where spring roosts were usually located in tree-dominated areas, which are the major feeding grounds. The discriminant analysis on human disturbance variables indicated that summer roosts were positively associated with night illumination. The microhabitat temperatures of winter roosts were significantly higher than those of most other roosts on cold nights. Conclusions The results highlighted significant variations among roosts, and seasonal roost switching was likely driven by specific microhabitat characteristics of each roost site, such as microclimate. It also helps us understand the behavioural adaptation of birds to urban environments. Keywords: Communal roosting, Human disturbance, Land use, Microclimate, Seasonal variation