Non-consultant career grade doctors in genitourinary medicine: as revalidation approaches, are some jobs at risk?

• Published in: International journal of STD & AIDS Vol. 16; no. 9; p. 596
• Main Authors: Mullan, H, Challenor, R, Chandramani, S, Theobald, N, Rogstad, K
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01-09-2005
• Subjects: Accreditation; Clinical Competence; Congresses as Topic - statistics & numerical data; Consultants; Education, Medical, Continuing; Female Urogenital Diseases; Humans; Male Urogenital Diseases; Medicine - statistics & numerical data; Physicians - statistics & numerical data; Specialization; Surveys and Questionnaires; Training Support; United Kingdom
• ISSN: 0956-4624
• DOI: 10.1258/0956462054944570

The Genitourinary Medicine Non-Consultant Career Grade Group (GUM NCCG Group) was established for the purpose of looking at training and contractual issues for this heterogeneous group of doctors. In June 2003, 700 questionnaires were posted to NCCG doctors in the UK to enquire about various aspects of working conditions. A summary of the 244 replies (35% response) is presented. Eighty-four (34%) had a job plan and 81 (33%) had had an appraisal. Just over one-third (38%) had time allocated for continuing medical education (CME), audit and administration. The response of employers to attempts by NCCGs to upgrade was poor. In all, 195 (80%) said they were registered for the purpose of continuing professional development (CPD), 43 (18%) were not and six people did not know whether they were registered or not. These results give cause for real concern at this point regarding revalidation pathways. Our survey highlights that NCCGs are disadvantaged in terms of appraisal, CPD and career progression and some jobs will be at risk as revalidation approaches.