Antimicrobial compounds from an FDA‐approved drug library with activity against Streptococcus suis

Aim Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a global concern. Developing novel antimicrobials is one of the most effective approaches in tackling AMR. Considering its relatively low cost and risk, drug repurposing has been proposed as a valuable approach for novel antimicrobial discovery. The aim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied microbiology Vol. 132; no. 3; pp. 1877 - 1886
Main Authors: Li, Haotian, Li, Tingting, Zhang, Liangsheng, Hu, Qiao, Liao, Xia, Jiang, Qinggen, Qiu, Xiuxiu, Li, Lu, Draheim, Roger R., Huang, Qi, Zhou, Rui
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Oxford University Press 01-03-2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a global concern. Developing novel antimicrobials is one of the most effective approaches in tackling AMR. Considering its relatively low cost and risk, drug repurposing has been proposed as a valuable approach for novel antimicrobial discovery. The aim of this study was to screen for antimicrobial compounds against Streptococcus suis, an important zoonotic bacterial pathogen, from an Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved drug library. Methods and Results In this study, we tested the antimicrobial activity of 1815 FDA‐approved drugs against S. suis. Sixty‐seven hits were obtained that showed a growth inhibition of more than 98%. After excluding already known antibiotics and antiseptics, 12 compounds were subjected to minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) assessment against S. suis. This showed that pralatrexate, daunorubicin (hydrochloride), teniposide, aclacinomycin A hydrochloride and floxuridine gave a relatively low MIC, ranging from 0.85 to 5.25 μg/ml. Apart from pralatrexate, the remaining four drugs could also inhibit the growth of antimicrobial‐resistant S. suis. It was also demonstrated that these four drugs had better efficacy against Gram‐positive bacteria than Gram‐negative bacteria. Cytotoxicity assays showed that floxuridine and teniposide had a relatively high 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50). The in vivo efficacy of floxuridine was analysed using a Galleria mellonella larvae infection model, and the results showed that floxuridine was effective in treating S. suis infection in vivo. Conclusions Five compounds from the FDA‐approved drug library showed high antimicrobial activity against S. suis, among which floxuridine displayed potent in vivo efficacy that is worth further development. Significance and Impact of Study Our study identified several antimicrobial compounds that are effective against S. suis, which provides a valuable starting point for further antimicrobial development.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1364-5072
1365-2672
DOI:10.1111/jam.15377