Noninvasive, tube‐based, continuous vagal nerve monitoring using the laryngeal adductor reflex: Feasibility study of 134 nerves at risk

Background Continuous vagal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) currently requires placement of a vagal nerve electrode. Herein, we present data from 100 patients (134 nerves‐at‐risk) monitored continuously during neck endocrine surgeries using a noninvasive, new methodology that solely utilizes e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Head & neck Vol. 40; no. 11; pp. 2498 - 2506
Main Authors: Sinclair, Catherine F., Téllez, Maria J., Ulkatan, Sedat
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-11-2018
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Continuous vagal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) currently requires placement of a vagal nerve electrode. Herein, we present data from 100 patients (134 nerves‐at‐risk) monitored continuously during neck endocrine surgeries using a noninvasive, new methodology that solely utilizes endotracheal tube electrodes to simultaneously stimulate laryngeal mucosa and record a laryngeal adductor reflex continuous IONM (LAR‐C‐IONM) response. Methods The laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) was elicited by electrical laryngeal mucosal stimulation on the side contralateral to the operative field using endotracheal tube electrodes. All patients completed preoperative and postoperative laryngeal and voice examinations. Results One hundred patients (134 nerves‐at‐risk) were included. Significantly more nerves‐at‐risk with an LAR opening to closing amplitude decrement >60% or with absolute closing amplitude <100 μV had postoperative vocal fold paralysis (P < .001). The LAR‐C‐IONM was highly sensitive to recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) stretch or compression. Conclusion The LAR‐C‐IONM is a promising new way to perform continuous vagal monitoring that requires no equipment other than an electromyography (EMG) endotracheal tube and is undergoing further, large‐scale evaluation.
Bibliography:Catherine F. Sinclair, Maria J. Téllez, and Sedat Ulkatan contributed equally to this article.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1043-3074
1097-0347
DOI:10.1002/hed.25377