Actomyosin contraction during cellularization is regulated in part by Src64 control of Actin 5C protein levels

Summary Src64 is required for actomyosin contraction during cellularization of the Drosophila embryonic blastoderm. The mechanism of actomyosin ring constriction is poorly understood even though a number of cytoskeletal regulators have been implicated in the assembly, organization, and contraction o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) Vol. 57; no. 6; pp. e23297 - n/a
Main Authors: Carter, Tammy Y., Gadwala, Swetha, Chougule, Ashish B., Bui, Anh P. N., Sanders, Alex C., Chaerkady, Raghothama, Cormier, Nathaly, Cole, Robert N., Thomas, Jeffrey H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-06-2019
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Src64 is required for actomyosin contraction during cellularization of the Drosophila embryonic blastoderm. The mechanism of actomyosin ring constriction is poorly understood even though a number of cytoskeletal regulators have been implicated in the assembly, organization, and contraction of these microfilament rings. How these cytoskeletal processes are regulated during development is even less well understood. To investigate the role of Src64 as an upstream regulator of actomyosin contraction, we conducted a proteomics screen to identify proteins whose expression levels are controlled by src64. Global levels of actin are reduced in src64 mutant embryos. Furthermore, we show that reduction of the actin isoform Actin 5C causes defects in actomyosin contraction during cellularization similar to those caused by src64 mutation, indicating that a relatively high level of Actin 5C is required for normal actomyosin contraction and furrow canal structure. However, reduction of Actin 5C levels only slows down actomyosin ring constriction rather than preventing it, suggesting that src64 acts not only to modulate actin levels, but also to regulate the actomyosin cytoskeleton by other means.
Bibliography:Tammy Y. Carter, Department of Laboratory Sciences and Primary Care, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601 4th Street, STOP 6281, Lubbock, TX 79430.
Funding information
American Heart Association, Grant/Award Number: 09BGIA2260616; Laura W. Bush Institute for Women's Health and the University Medical Center; South Plains Foundation; Southwest Cancer Treatment and Research Center; Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Nathaly Cormier, Biological Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin‐Whitewater, Upham Hall, 800 W Main Street, Whitewater, WI 53190
Present address
Ashish B. Chougule, Perkin Elmer, Hopkinton, MA 01748.
Correction added on 3 June 2019, after first online publication: Article type changed from “Review” to “Research Article.”
Alex C. Sanders, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205.
Raghothama Chaerkady, MedImmune, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1526-954X
1526-968X
DOI:10.1002/dvg.23297