Application of rape pod sealants to reduce adverse environmental impacts

BACKGROUND Rape (Brassica napus L.) is a major global oilseed crop characterized by its high potential as an alimentary oil and in biodiesel production. The two most popular pod sealants (PS) used to reduce rape pod shattering are products in the pinolene range (di‐1‐p‐menthene) and latex polymer pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the science of food and agriculture Vol. 98; no. 6; pp. 2428 - 2436
Main Authors: Bauša, Laimis, Steponavičius, Dainius, Jotautienė, Eglė, Kemzūraitė, Aurelija, Zaleckas, Ernestas
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-04-2018
John Wiley and Sons, Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND Rape (Brassica napus L.) is a major global oilseed crop characterized by its high potential as an alimentary oil and in biodiesel production. The two most popular pod sealants (PS) used to reduce rape pod shattering are products in the pinolene range (di‐1‐p‐menthene) and latex polymer products. Reports on the effective preservation of seed yield by these products are fairly contradictory. With this in mind, an experimental PS (PS4) that contained the active agents acrylic and trisiloxane was developed. RESULTS Comparative experimental trials of the developed PS4 and three other PS (PS1, PS2 and PS3) containing active agents that are generally used for sealant production were conducted. The studies showed that the static and dynamic surface tension of PS4 was the lowest at the same concentration (2.0 g kg−1), consequently demonstrating the lowest spray drift. The chemical substances from PS had not penetrated the rape seeds in any of the PSs. CONCLUSION The results indicate that treatment with PS4 exerts a beneficial effect in reducing rape seed yield loss (68–104 kg ha−1 in 2014 and 194–305 kg ha−1 in 2015) compared to other investigated PS. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-5142
1097-0010
DOI:10.1002/jsfa.8735