A step-by-step approach to endorectal proctopexy (ERPP): how we do it

• Published in: Techniques in coloproctology Vol. 25; no. 7; pp. 879 - 886
• Main Authors: Gallo, G., Clerico, G., Realis Luc, A., Trompetto, M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01-07-2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Colorectal Surgery; Gastroenterology; How I Do It; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Pelvic organ prolapse; Proctology; Surgery; Surgical techniques; Endorectal proctopexy (ERPP); Internal rectal prolapse; Rectal mucosal prolapse; Rectal intussusception; Pelvic organ prolapse; Internal delorme; Obstructed defecation syndrome; Rectocele
• ISSN: 1123-6337; 1128-045X
• DOI: 10.1007/s10151-021-02467-y

There are many surgical treatments aimed at correcting internal mucosal prolapse and rectocele associated with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Perineal procedures can be considered as first options in young men in whom an abdominal approach poses risks of sexual dysfunction and in selected women with isolated posterior compartment prolapse who failed conservative treatment. About 20 years ago, we described endorectal proctopexy (ERPP) also known as internal Delorme procedure. The aim of the present study was to describe, with attention to technical details and the aid of a video, the different steps of ERPP for the treatment of ODS. A retrospective analysis of our last 100 cases confirms our initial good results. Complications included suture line dehiscence with consequent stricture in four patients (4%). Bleeding occurred in four (4%) patients and was conservatively treated. Transient anal continence impairment consisting of urgency and soiling occurred in 12 (12%) and 6 (6%) patients, respectively. At 6-month follow-up the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score and ODS score improved from a median preoperative value of 18.9 and 18.5 to 5 and 5, respectively (
p
 < 0.0001). The mean follow-up was 36.05 ± 13.3 (range 12–58) months and anatomical recurrence rate was 6 (%). Due to its excellent safety profile and the ability to tailor the procedure to different disease presentations, we think that ERPP should be part of the basic armamentarium of all colorectal surgeons operating on the pelvic floor.