Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union

• Published in: Ecosystem services Vol. 52; p. 101359
• Main Authors: Bagstad, Kenneth J., Ingram, Jane Carter, Shapiro, Carl D., La Notte, Alessandra, Maes, Joachim, Vallecillo, Sara, Casey, C. Frank, Glynn, Pierre D., Heris, Mehdi P., Johnson, Justin A., Lauer, Chris, Matuszak, John, Oleson, Kirsten L.L., Posner, Stephen M., Rhodes, Charles, Voigt, Brian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01-12-2021
• Subjects: Natural capital accounting; Private-sector accounting; SEEA Central Framework; SEEA Ecosystem Accounting; System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA); SEEA Ecosystem Accounting; Private-sector accounting; System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA); Natural capital accounting; SEEA Central Framework
• ISSN: 2212-0416; 2212-0416
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101359

•Natural capital accounting practice is advancing rapidly.•We summarize recent natural capital accounting examples in world’s largest economies.•Improving data quality for representative time series is a key challenge.•More applications will help consolidate natural capital accounting methods and practice.•Close coordination with policymakers needed to drive demand for accounts production.
The United States and European Union (EU) face common challenges in managing natural capital and balancing conservation and resource use with consumption of other forms of capital. This paper synthesizes findings from 11 individual application papers from a special issue of Ecosystem Services on natural capital accounting (NCA) and their application to the public and private sectors in the EU and U.S. NCA is inherently a data-integration centered exercise, aiming to draw new insights by realigning environmental and economic data into a consistent framework. Drawing primarily on papers from the special issue and other key NCA literature, we identify lessons learned and gaps remaining for NCA’s development and application to decision making. In doing so, we identify eight key similarities and three major differences in NCA development, status, and application between the U.S. and EU. NCA can be highly policy relevant: special issue papers address critical issues including agriculture, water, conservation/land-use planning, climate, and corporate decision making. In both the U.S. and EU, further application is needed to drive demand for the accounts’ production. Based on these experiences, the U.S. and EU can be important leaders in cross-sector, international collaboration toward next-generation environmental economic accounts that advance global NCA practice.