Treatment of Necrotizing Enterocolitis

To the Editor: The study by Moss et al. (May 25 issue) 1 is impressive because it represents a successful multicenter, prospective, randomized trial investigating therapies for necrotizing enterocolitis. However, 60 percent of the study cohort did not have evidence of pneumatosis on radiography, 77...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The New England journal of medicine Vol. 355; no. 8; pp. 846 - 847
Main Author: Gordon, Phillip V
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Massachusetts Medical Society 24-08-2006
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To the Editor: The study by Moss et al. (May 25 issue) 1 is impressive because it represents a successful multicenter, prospective, randomized trial investigating therapies for necrotizing enterocolitis. However, 60 percent of the study cohort did not have evidence of pneumatosis on radiography, 77 percent weighed less than 1000 g at birth, 30 percent were not receiving enteral feeding before perforation occurred, and more than 30 percent had perforation within the first two weeks after birth. These features suggest a diagnosis of spontaneous intestinal perforation rather than necrotizing enterocolitis. 2 – 4 Several investigators have reported better outcomes with spontaneous intestinal perforation . . .
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ObjectType-Commentary-2
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMc061678