Movement of abutment teeth in spring cantilever bridges: a laboratory study

The extent and directions of movements of spring bridge abutments were studied on acrylic casts with resilient steep and shallow palates and containing human molar and premolar abutments with compressible 'periodontal ligaments'. Bridges with rigid bars and 'flexible' standard, l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of oral rehabilitation Vol. 10; no. 2; p. 97
Main Authors: Gray, H S, Myers, G E
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England 01-03-1983
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The extent and directions of movements of spring bridge abutments were studied on acrylic casts with resilient steep and shallow palates and containing human molar and premolar abutments with compressible 'periodontal ligaments'. Bridges with rigid bars and 'flexible' standard, long and short lengths were cast in Type IV gold, and soldered to Type III gold retainers which were pinned to the abutments. The pontic on each bar was depressed a standard 0.2 mm, and the movement of the abutments registered on a dial gauge resting against the mesio-buccal corner of each retainer. The combination of bar length and palatal contour causing least movement of an abutment was the shortest bar to the molar abutment in the shallow palate model; indeed all bars on this model deflected the molar abutment less than similar bars on the steep palate model. Differences in palatal contours did not affect the extent of movements of the premolar abutments which were comparable to molar movements in the steep palate model. Abutment teeth moved mesio-buccally when the pontic was depressed, and the elbow of the bar usually moved off the palate indicating the fulcrum was positioned along the anterior section of the bar.
ISSN:0305-182X
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1983.tb00104.x