Evaluation of the Met Office global forecast model using Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) data
Simulations of the top‐of‐atmosphere radiative‐energy budget from the Met Office global numerical weather‐prediction model are evaluated using new data from the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) instrument on board the Meteosat‐8 satellite. Systematic discrepancies between the model simula...
Saved in:
Published in: | Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Vol. 133; no. 629; pp. 1993 - 2010 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01-10-2007
Wiley |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Simulations of the top‐of‐atmosphere radiative‐energy budget from the Met Office global numerical weather‐prediction model are evaluated using new data from the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) instrument on board the Meteosat‐8 satellite. Systematic discrepancies between the model simulations and GERB measurements greater than 20 Wm−2 in outgoing long‐wave radiation (OLR) and greater than 60 Wm−2 in reflected short‐wave radiation (RSR) are identified over the period April–September 2006 using 12 UTC data. Convective cloud over equatorial Africa is spatially less organized and less reflective than in the GERB data. This bias depends strongly on convective‐cloud cover, which is highly sensitive to changes in the model convective parametrization. Underestimates in model OLR over the Gulf of Guinea coincide with unrealistic southerly cloud outflow from convective centres to the north. Large overestimates in model RSR over the subtropical ocean, greater than 50 Wm−2 at 12 UTC, are explained by unrealistic radiative properties of low‐level cloud relating to overestimation of cloud liquid water compared with independent satellite measurements. The results of this analysis contribute to the development and improvement of parametrizations in the global forecast model. Copyright © 2007 Royal Meteorological Society |
---|---|
Bibliography: | The contributions of Sean Milton and Malcolm Brooks of Met Office, Exeter, were prepared as part of their official duties as employees of the UK Government. They are published with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0035-9009 1477-870X |
DOI: | 10.1002/qj.166 |