Mitochondrial small heat shock protein and chilling tolerance in tomato fruit

•The role of M-sHSP23.8 in the chilling stress was evaluated.•Overexpression of M-sHSP23.8 prevented fruit chilling injury.•Knock-down lines of M-sHSP23.8 suffered damage due to cold stress.•Alterations at almost all classes of glycerolipids in fruit after chilling stress.•The higher chilling injury...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Postharvest biology and technology Vol. 175; p. 111491
Main Authors: Escobar, Mariela R., Ré, Martín D., Sossi, María L., Boggio, Silvana B., Herrfurth, Cornelia, Feussner, Ivo, Valle, Estela M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01-05-2021
Elsevier BV
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The role of M-sHSP23.8 in the chilling stress was evaluated.•Overexpression of M-sHSP23.8 prevented fruit chilling injury.•Knock-down lines of M-sHSP23.8 suffered damage due to cold stress.•Alterations at almost all classes of glycerolipids in fruit after chilling stress.•The higher chilling injury of the fruit was related to the altered glycerolipidome. Our previous report indicated that tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit of two contrasting varieties in the chilling tolerance showed the opposite expression pattern of a mitochondrial small heat shock protein (M-sHSP23.8) gene after chilling stress. Thus, the fruit of the relatively tolerant variety Micro-Tom strongly accumulated M-sHSP23.8 transcripts while the susceptible var. Minitomato fruit did not. To test whether M-sHSP23.8 is involved in tomato fruit protection mechanisms against chilling stress, Minitomato fruit overexpressing M-sHSP23.8 (OE23.8) and knockdown Micro-Tom fruit with reduced levels of M-sHSP23.8 (amiR23.8) were developed. After chilling treatment, most of the amiR23.8 fruit failed to ripen normally, showed wilting and skin wrinkles, partial discoloration, and did not reach full red color. On the contrary, these chilling injury symptoms were significantly diminished in OE23.8 fruit, showing less visible deterioration after chilling. Fruit of OE23.8 and amiR23.8 showed opposite patterns of water loss, electrolyte leakage, and expression of the tomato catalase 1 gene compared to control fruit. Membrane lipidome profile evidenced that amiR23.8 fruit showed differential adjustment of extraplastidic and plastidic lipids and variations in the lipid remodeling compared to control fruit, suggesting alterations in the membrane integrity. The high sensitivity of Micro-Tom amiR23.8 fruit and the better performance of Minitomato OE23.8 fruit to chilling treatment indicate that sHSP23.8 may be crucial in the chilling stress tolerance in tomato fruit.
ISSN:0925-5214
1873-2356
DOI:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2021.111491