Exacerbations and Real-World Outcomes After Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy of Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate, Among Patients with COPD: Results from the EROS (US) Study [Corrigendum]

Strange C, Tkacz J, Schinkel J, et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023;18:2245-2256. The authors have advised that there are errors in the 95% CI interval values on page 2248. Results, Baseline and Follow-Up Exacerbation Rates, sentence 3, the text "Relative rates of total exacerbations f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Vol. 19; pp. 1799 - 1800
Main Authors: Strange, Charlie, Tkacz, Joseph, Schinkel, Jill, Lewing, Benjamin, Agatep, Barnabie, Swisher, Sean, Patel, Sushma, Edwards, Devechio, Touchette, Daniel, Portillo, Edward, Feigler, Norbert, Pollack, Michael
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press Limited 31-08-2024
Dove
Dove Medical Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Strange C, Tkacz J, Schinkel J, et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023;18:2245-2256. The authors have advised that there are errors in the 95% CI interval values on page 2248. Results, Baseline and Follow-Up Exacerbation Rates, sentence 3, the text "Relative rates of total exacerbations for prompt were 0.76, 95% CI: (0.72 - 0.79) and 0.66, 95% CI: (0.63 - 0.69) versus delayed and very delayed" should read "Relative rates of total exacerbations for prompt were 0.76, 95% CI: (0.69 - 0.83) and 0.66, 95% CI: (0.60 - 0.72) versus delayed and very delayed". Results, Baseline and Follow-Up Exacerbation Rates, sentence 5, the text "Relative rates of severe exacerbations for prompt were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.90) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.29-0.47) versus delayed and very delayed" should read "Relative rates of severe exacerbations for prompt were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.45-1.15) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.22-0.55) versus delayed and very delayed". The authors apologize for these errors and confirm that the overarching interpretation of the results and conclusions of the study remain consistent with the originally published article and no other text or figures are affected.
ISSN:1178-2005
1176-9106
1178-2005
DOI:10.2147/COPD.S484253